Go-GN/SN, U1–NA (°) and U1–NA (mm) values for manual method were statistically lower than those for the app method. L1–NB (°) and upper lip protrusion values for the manual method were statistically higher than those for the app method. The ANB value for the manual method was statistically lower than that of app method. Results: SNA (Sella, Nasion, A point angle) and SNB (Sella, Nasion, B point angle) values for the manual method were statistically lower ( p < .001) than those for the app method. The durations of the performances of the two methods were also compared. Five skeletal measurements, five dental measurements and two soft tissue measurements were managed based on 21 landmarks. Materials and methods: The cephalometric radiographs of 55 patients (25 females and 30 males) were traced via the manual and app methods and were subsequently examined with Steiner’s analysis. Objective: This study aimed to compare the results of conventional manual cephalometric tracing with those acquired with smartphone application cephalometric tracing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |